You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘sportsengineering’ category.
Dr Simon Choppin and Dr Tom Allen are acting as guest editors for a special edition of Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. The issue looks at the use of predictive modelling in sport and how it can be used to predict new behaviour, essentially how technology influences sports performance! If you’re an academic and have some work which you’d like to submit, we have further information here, including progress with the edition and information on how to submit.
Although not an avid follower of winter sports, I noticed that the world record for the ski-jump was broken on the 11th of February. Johan Remen Evensen of Norway jumped 246.5 m at the Nordic Vikersundbakken ski jumping hill. The video below shows the jump itself.
The American science magazine; Popular Science recently posted an article regarding a new basketball sensor system. The system is able to track a player’s performance as they dribble, pass or make a shot, although from the article it is unclear whether this system is legal for use during competition or strictly training only.
Sensor systems in sport
Hawkeye is a familiar sensor system used for a number of sports, not only to govern the game (line-calling in tennis for example) but also to provide metrics and visualisations for a modern television audience hungry for stats. However, accurate multi-camera systems such as Hawkeye come at a great cost in terms of use and installation.
What is interesting about the new basketball sensor system is that it is contained within the ball itself. The company behind the technology, 94Fifty, is a startup from the University of Michigan and aims to provide an affordable coaching system for basketball teams at all levels.
The difficulty in embedding a sensor in a sports ball is that it has to be substantial enough that it won’t be damaged during the rigours of play, but also light enough that it does not affect the behaviour of the ball in any significant way.
My curiosity was piqued recently on a last-minute Christmas shopping trip. As I wandered round the sports section of a local branch of a department store, my mind was struggling to contend with the mental challenges of garish festive displays, oppressive crowding and music so good it’s only played for a few weeks every year. As the drudgery wore on, my eye was drawn to what seemed to be an exciting new product, it was presented very well with attractive graphics and sleek matt packaging. The box contained what seems to be a thin rubber bracelet with two small holographic discs embedded diametrically opposite each other. What did it do? The box claimed it was ‘Performance Technology’ but even after prying the box open and scanning the contents I could find no explanation or instructions on how this technology should be used.

The Power Balance Bracelet
Day two in Vienna and all’s going well, the conference started off with a fantastic keynote lecture by Benno Nigg discussing impact forces and muscle activation in running. It was interesting to note he stressed the importance of muscle activation in the running strike and not just peak force, which has been used recently to promote barefoot running. Muscle activation is a good indicator of fatigue levels and should reveal if wearing trainers can reduce the effort required to run as there’s been no evidence that running barefoot reduces injury.
He also mentioned that the promotion of barefoot running roughly has a 25 year cycle (big news in 1960, 1985 and 2010), if this blog is still going in 2035 and barefoot running becomes big news again I’ll try to remember to mention it. (See here for some videos of Benno and more detail on his work)


